![]() ![]() This creates a gap on which quantitative results need further explanation and the selection criteria of the sample. The Follow-up explanations variant and Participant-selection variant for the sequential explanatory model differ in the connection of the two phases, with one focusing on which results to be examined in more detail and the other on the appropriate participants to be selected. The article provided a methodological overview of priority, implementation and mixing in the sequential explanatory design and also outlines the steps for graphically representing the procedures in a mixed method sequential explanatory model. The issue of the sequence of data collection and analysis, the stage or stages in the research process at which the quantitative and qualitative data are connected and the results integrated will be discussed. The paper will also discuss the rationale on the priority or weight given to the quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis. The design is considered the most conventional of the mixed methods designs. This paper takes a divergent view and critically analyzes the mixed method sequential Explanatory design. It also seeks to discuss the current state of this debate and the rationale for its selection in a mixed method study. This paper focuses on some procedural issues related to the Mixed Methods sequential explanatory design which has had a contested history of inquiry and divergent views of its appropriateness by researchers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |